The BMC & the Builders are the ultimate
beneficiaries after the amendment in the Development Control (DC) Rules, 1991 –
interprets Adv. R.
P. Rathod.
The Chief Minister Shri. Prithviraj Chavan on Tuesday Okayed a path-breaking policy to streamline building approvals in the city and check the nexus between unscrupulous developers and Municipal Officials who sanction Building Plans.
In our earlier columns Now 35% Compensatory FSI likely for Mumbai City & A Proposal of BMC to amend Development Control (DC) Rules, 1991 is underway
We
had explained about the policy proposal Formulated
by Municipal Commissioner Subodh Kumar, the policy was to curtail his own
discretionary powers to grant building concessions to developers. Most building
files will now be approved at the Civic Executive
Engineer’s Level and only in rare cases will they be put up before the Municipal
Commissioner.
The new approved policy will levy a Heavy Premium on builders who want to build a little more than the permissible floor space index (FSI)—the ratio of the total built-up area vis-a-vis the plot size. The BMC hopes to earn around Rs 1,000 crore a year by charging this premium. The amended Policy will offer 35% Compensatory floor space index (FSI) for residential buildings and 20% for both Commercial and Industrial Structures.
Subodh Kumar is the first civic chief in over a
decade who went out of his way to curb the discretionary powers vested in the
Municipal Commissioner to sanction building concessions to developers. Earlier Municipal Commissioners liberally cleared
projects with unusually large flower beds, voids, lily ponds and car decks.
These areas are not included in the building’s FSI. These concessions allowed
developers to build an additional 50% to 80% above the permitted builtup area.
The
developer would sell these free spaces to buyers at market rate and then
encourage them to illegally amalgamate these areas to make the apartment
bigger. For instance, the flower bed area or a car deck is shown as part of the
living room or bedroom by the builder.
The
racket is rampant in the lucrative Bandra-Khar-Santa-Cruz-Juhu belt where maximum violations are
believed to have taken place. Land prices are phenomenally high in this zone
because land owners know that builders will make super profits by paying bribes
to BMC officials and Local Politicians to
procure maximum concessions for their projects.
Civic
Officials said the misuse was so rampant that some builders could virtually
double the size of the saleable area of an apartment by illegally merging these
“free of FSI” spaces into the habitable
area. The BMC detected that in some cases, while the actual size of the flat
was just 1,500 sq ft, the terrace adjoining it could measure 3,000 sq ft. The
builder would sell the apartment showing its size as 4,500 sq ft. Although
rules restrict a flowerbed area to 1.2-1.5 meters, some civic commissioners had
in the past allowed certain builders to construct up to 3 meters.
Now What this
Rule Interprets, Common areas will soon be included in FSI Concessions. Currently, areas
such as the lobby, lift, staircases,
flower beds, ducts, balconies and lily ponds are not counted in a building's
FSI. FSI is a development tool that lays down norms on how much you can
construct on a plot. Although the lobby, staircase and such other elements are
not included in the FSI, several builders sell the space by deeming these
elements "Super Built-up"
area.
Now after the amendment areas such as the Flower beds, voids, balconies and lily ponds will be counted in the Building's FSI. In lieu, builders will get compensatory FSI of 35% for houses and 20% for commercial structures. Further 25% extra parking will be allowed on premium but without counting it in FSI.
Under this new
policy, Premium will be levied at rates 60%, 80%
and 100% based on the ready
reckoner(RR) rates for extra FSI in residential, industrial and commercial buildings
respectively. However,
premium will not be levied on rehab buildings. Developers rehousing tenants of
cessed buildings in the island city or existing members of housing societies in
the suburbs are exempted from paying a
premium.
For End user, What is the Interpretation of all
this says Adv. R. P. Rathod: Flower
Bed, Balcony, Terrace, etc. are going to be included in FSI. Though
all these steps are formulated to
bring in transparency in the Realty Sector, the end results might be harsh on
the end users, since these
areas get included in FSI, the builder will pass on this to the end user & will start
Legally charging for it & incidentally the property rates might hike or
alternatively the space offered by the Builders might start to shrink says Adv. R. P. Rathod. The only difference is that post amendment the Govt. will now get their
share in the "Super
Built-up" area in form of additional revenue.
Adv. R. P. Rathod
further adds that this amended Policy will mainly help the BMC to earn additional revenue by
charging the Builders for areas they used to earlier utilize
illegally & will break the nexus of Builders and Civic Officials
who approve Building Plans just to a certain extent, the Consumer or the Flat
buyer is nowhere in this Picture & will benefit nothing as explained above,
on the contrary this policy
will add burden on the end users. This logic is very clear explains Adv. R. P. Rathod,
the Ground reality is that every Builder is
already charging the Flat Buyers for all the Open Spaces, now out of this charges
the builder will have to shell some amount to the BMC, which he can afford to
do, but the Big question is where is
the Consumer in this story and How & What will he benefit out of this
Policy. The BMC &
the Builders are the ultimate beneficiaries, as after
paying the Premium the Builder will officially get additional FSI, no
prices in guessing that this additional FSI will add his stock & will help him Build
additional Flats, which he will sell as per the Market Rate.
Now it’s Official, that these proposals are sanction, enacted
& enforced the property prices are set to rise further by atleast 10% to 15% and the next step will be that MCGM
will start charging Property Tax for these areas also, as they are included in FSI, needless to
say ultimately adding a burden on the end user concludes Adv. R. P. Rathod.